« Sustainability's Slow-motion Revolution | Main | Young at Heart »

December 12, 2005

Toxic Whales

BBC News reports that orcas are the most toxic-contaminated mammals in the Arctic. Fat samples recently taken from killer whales in a Norwegian fjord revealed startlingly high levels of pesticides, PCBs, and flame retardants.

Whales in the Arctic may be somewhat more susceptible because toxics often concentrate in the polar regions, but the Norwegian whales are a reminder that the southern resident orcas of Cascadia are also sickened by high levels of toxics. And unlike their Arctic brethren, the whales of BC and Washington are next door neighbors to millions of people and our heavy industry. All those increasingly banned and phased-out flame retardants persist in the environment where they can continue to poison both people and wildlife.

As we begin to plan for protecting the southern residents under the Endangered Species Act, perhaps we should consider testing the southern residents for toxics in a systematic way. The last time one of the southern residents was tested for PCBs (a dead whale that had washed ashore) it registered perhaps the highest levels of contamination ever measured in a killer whale--so high that the machines had to be re-calibrated. Not only would tests help us prioritize the most critical threats to orcas, but their levels of contamination may give us clues about how vigilant we ought to be about toxic-laden consumer products.

Posted by Eric de Place | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834573a7069e200d8349aa1e169e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Toxic Whales:

Comments

The ethical dilemma we need to consider is whether the need for refined and updated data on toxic contamination, prey sources, reproductive rates per individual, and possibly historical optimum population size, are worth the intrusive disruption of shooting biopsy darts into the flanks of our endangered orcas. To my knowledge there have been no cases of serious wounds or infections due to darting, but for the whale, the experience of being shot by a stinging dart needs to be considered as a serious insult. Any further discussion here is welcome, and public comments are due Jan. 3 for the National Marine Fisheries Service's proposed conservation plan for Puget Sound's resident orcas.
For information, visit tinyurl.com/a4yff.
Write to Chief, Protected Resources Division, 1201 N.E. Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232; or e-mail [email protected].

Posted by: Howard Garrett | Dec 13, 2005 9:39:59 AM