January 25, 2006
New studies of King County, Washington find that sprawl is linked to dirtier air and bigger bellies. Walkable neighborhoods (those places with higher residential density, more street connections, and nearby to shops, schools, and parks) appear to be healthier for residents and less damaging to air quality--even when taking into account age, income, education and ethnicity.
A few key findings (liberally excerpted from the full coverage in the Seattle Times):
- On average the Body Mass Index — a measure of height and weight — of residents of the more walkable neighborhoods was lower, and they were more likely to get 30 minutes of daily exercise.
- People who lived and worked in more walkable neighborhoods produced fewer pollutants associated with smog.
- A 5 percent increase in a neighborhood's walkability index was associated with a 0.23-point drop in Body Mass Index. Bigger changes in a neighborhood's walkability would be expected to produce greater differences in weight.
Posted by Eric de Place | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Slim City:
I'm glad to see more of this type of research. An additional step would be to compare the long-term costs of buying or renting in a walkable neighborhood versus "lifestyle" costs.
In other words, does it pencil out to pay the often higher up-front housing costs to live in an urban core when you consider the potentially lower costs of transportation, healthcare, etc. If so, how long does it take?
Armed with that data, one could make policy proposals to help low- to moderate-income households overcome any higher up-front housing costs.
I would hypothesize that the playing field is not level, and that policy intervention may be needed to change that.
Posted by: Steven Salmi | Jan 29, 2006 12:30:09 PM