« The Leader of the Snowpack | Main | Young Is The New Old »

April 18, 2005

Thinking Small

This article from Saturday's Seattle P-I warmed my heart:  Seattle-area utilities are apparently taking energy conservation much more seriously.  In some ways, of course, the utilities have to do this.  New power plants are expensive, and fuelling them is becoming even moreso, so utilities may no longer have the luxury of simply adding new plants to meet rising demand for electricity. 

The utilities are going about promoting conservation in an especially smart way, using a process called "least cost planning" -- in which the utilities evaluate a bunch of different energy saving ideas for cost effectiveness, and then make the best buys first.  This is a great idea, since it gets the cheap energy savings up front -- meaning that there's more money to invest in other energy-saving ideas down the road.  Puget Sound Energy is actually running a lot of pilot projects right now, trying to find out how much money and energy different strategies will save.  From the article...

Puget [Sound Energy] is testing...such ideas as getting industrial customers to "tune up" their boilers, to see if that not only cuts fuel consumption but proves cheaper than buying brand new boilers. It is investigating whether it can avoid the expense of expanding an electrical substation by getting residential electric heating customers in a particular area to convert to gas.

Puget has also worked with restaurants to test low-flow spray heads to rinse dishes before they're put in a commercial dishwasher. So far, Shirley said, the test shows that using such spray heads cuts water use by 60 percent and gas use by 20 to 30 percent.

Mobile homes, Shirley said, often "hemorrhage a lot of Btus" because heating ducts have developed gaps or weren't well insulated to begin with.

Puget is also testing whether single-family homes built from the 1950s to the 1970s can be effectively "weatherized" without creating moisture or dry-rot problems.

The utility recently concluded a program in Whatcom and Skagit counties in which it offered $35 to customers who turned in working, pre-1995 second refrigerators and freezers. Shirley said the offer proved popular enough that it will likely be converted to a regular offer by Puget.

The savings yielded by any particular strategy may be small, but they definitely add up.  In fact, energy analysts (including the folks at the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, the coordinating body for utilities in all the Columbia River basin and beyond) believe that the cheapest and most environmentally benign source of new energy for the foreseeable future isn't wind or solar (much less coal, natural gas, or nuclear power).  It's simple efficiency -- doing the same amount of work using vastly less energy.  That's an idea the everyone can get behind.

Posted by Clark Williams-Derry | Permalink

Comments

One think that would go a long way towards making better use of existing generating capability would be to add more East-West transmission capability, especially accross time zones.

Every day the peak period of electricity consumptionis when some people are still at work but others are getting home, cooking dinner, flipping on the tube, taking a shower and turning on the lights. As you go from east to west, this peak time moves an hour later as you cross time zones.

Electric utilities have to size their generating capacity for that peak load. If there were more transmission capacity accross time zones, utilities would be better able to share their existing peak capacity.

Posted by: Mark in Texas | Apr 18, 2005 5:40:07 PM

There's never enough time and money to do it right the first time, but there's always enough time and money to do it right the second time.

Retrofitting post-WWII houses to have adequate insulation. That's a lotta houses. Hopefully they can be retrofit to have some solar access in the winter too.

D

Posted by: Dano | Apr 19, 2005 12:39:15 PM

Given our penchant towards gigantism it is nice to see Puget going this route. There really is no good argument against efficiency, conservation and distributed generation and the benefits compound when we consider externalities and national security. Here's to solar panels and living simply!

Posted by: Ron | Apr 19, 2005 11:36:58 PM

Post a comment